"We did not follow cleverly devised myths when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we had been eyewitnesses of his majesty. For he received honor and glory from God the Father when that voice was conveyed to him by the Majestic Glory, saying, 'This is my Son, my Beloved, with whom I am well pleased.' We ourselves heard this voice come from heaven, while we were with him on the holy mountain. So we have the prophetic message more fully confirmed. You will do well to be attentive to this as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts." (2 Peter 1:16-19)
Let me ask you a magic question. When you go to see a magic act and the performers on stage show you an ordinary object--say a black top hat, a rabbit, or a deck of cards--why do you suppose they go to great lengths to prove to the audience that these are real, solid objects? Why have an audience member come up and inspect the cards? Why hold up the rabbit and have us witness its wriggling nose or twitching ears? Why tap the top of the hat with a knock of the hand, demonstrating its solidness?
Well, it's so that we know these things are what the magician says they are before putting them through whatever transformation the trick will bring to them. We have to know that the deck of cards isn't entirely made up of the eight of clubs so that we'll be amazed when he predicts that it was our card. We need to know that the rabbit isn't a plush toy that could be squished or flattened to fit in a pocket. We need to know that the hat is genuine rather than a chute into a secret compartment in the magician's cabinet. If we don't see convincingly that these objects are really what they appear to be, it will be meaningless when the performer makes the rabbit disappear, selects your card from the deck, or pulls a full-size umbrella from the hat. We need to know they are genuine what they are presented to be because of what comes next.
I think something like that is going on here in this passage from what we call Second Peter, which many of us heard this past Sunday in worship. It is, I'll confess, an unusual passage, because it's really the one place outside of the gospels that makes any reference to the story of Jesus being "transfigured" on the mountaintop, when his appearance changed and radiated light, Moses and Elijah appeared as celebrity cameo endorsements of Jesus' identity and mission, and then to cap it all off, the very voice of God repeated the claim that Jesus is God's "Beloved Son." It's uncommon to have references to these kinds of moments from Jesus' life mentioned in letters and epistles, for starters. And beyond that, this is just such an unusual event. It's not a miracle of healing or feeding that has a clear "purpose" or goal. It's not something we can verify with archaeological evidence, although the writer of Second Peter wants us to be certain that he is telling the truth and not just rehashing "cleverly devised myths." And since the whole event has a surreal, almost dream-like quality to it that is over too soon, we might be left wondering why the Bible even tells us this story. Why do we need to hear that Jesus was declared to be God's Son? Why tell us that somehow the long-deceased figures of Moses and Elijah were there on the summit without explaining to us how it happened, how they got there, or even just how anybody knew it was them (nametags, maybe?)? Why was this memory of the early followers of Jesus important enough to include in a letter for later Christians who didn't live through it when it happened?
Here's my hunch: I think this is Second Peter's way of telling us who Jesus REALLY is, so that we'll understand why it's a big deal that this same Jesus has gone to a cross for us, really did rise, and really will come in glory. The One who laid down his life on an ugly Roman execution stake really was the presence of God in a human life--and that God really was willing to go all the way to death for us. Jesus wasn't only one of countless victims of imperial violence. He wasn't merely a figure from a fable or a hero in a myth. He wasn't an apparition or a vision or a noble idea. Jesus was both as fully human as you can be and as fully divine as it gets--and that God was willing to go to a cross for us. There is no illusion. There is no trick. The rabbit isn't just a stuffed toy and the deck of cards isn't a decoy. Jesus really is the Son of God, and Second Peter wants us to know it for sure so that we'll understand the stakes of the rest of his story. In Jesus, God is willing to be swallowed up by death. In Jesus, no less than God is willing to be declared a "loser," a "weakling," and a "dangerous criminal." In Jesus, none other than God has been calling us to love our enemies, return good in the place of evil, and wash feet rather than insist on being served. Second Peter wants to be clear what Jesus says, God says. What Jesus does, God does. The people whom Jesus hangs out with are the folks God chooses to hang out with. And the boundaries that Jesus is willing to cross for the sake of other are--you guessed it--the boundaries that God has chosen to cross.
That certainly makes an impact on what we do with Jesus, especially when he challenges us. Second Peter doesn't really give us the option of saying, "Well, I like the idea of eternal life, but I just don't think Jesus is right when he identifies money as an idol." We can't say, "I'm all for Jesus, but I don't like his insistence on feeding hungry people without checking their backgrounds or welcoming foreigners as though they were him." We don't get to say, "That heaven stuff is fine, but I don't want to follow someone who dies for his enemies rather than killing them." The New Testament does not give us that option, because it insists that Jesus is none other than God in the flesh. We need to hear the voice assure us that Jesus is God's Beloved Son so that we will remember when Jesus goes to the cross that it is God who takes the nails. We need the message on the mountain in order to understand what comes next.
Jesus' call to us to follow him--on his particular way of life--is authoritative because of who he is. I can pick and choose which TV streaming services I pay for, which authors I read, and which talking heads in the news will get my attention. And when I don't like something they say, I can just change the channel, choose another that suits my liking, and keep control. But if Jesus really is--as 2 Peter and the rest of the New Testament insist--then I can't be a consumer at a salad bar taking only what I like. I am called to follow in the way of Jesus because of who he is. And at the same time, because Jesus is the fullness of God in a human life, it means that God hasn't chosen to stay off at a distance from a world full of pain and suffering, but to enter into it, all the way to death. I need to know that, so I need those reminders beforehand to show me who Jesus is.
Maybe we all do. What would change in your life if we took seriously that Jesus really is the Beloved Son of God? What if it happened... today?
Lord Jesus, remind us of who you are so that we will be conscious of your love and compelled to follow you, for whatever comes next.






